On Dec 13, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote:
On Dec 12, 2009, at 10:27 PM, Anders Carlsson wrote:
12 dec 2009 kl. 18.20 skrev Daniel Dunbar:
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
====================================================================
--- cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenObjC/property-list-in-class.m (original)
+++ cfe/trunk/test/CodeGenObjC/property-list-in-class.m Sat Dec 12
20:20:49 2009
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: clang -m64 -fobjc-nonfragile-abi -S -emit-llvm -o %t %s
+// RUN: clang-cc -fobjc-nonfragile-abi -emit-llvm -o - %s
Shouldn't this say clang -cc1 instead of clang-cc?
Can some one point me to documentation of clang-cc, 'clang -cc1...'
please.
Sorry, I missed it when it was posted.
In particular, tests continue to use clang-cc. clang-cc is not being
built any mode.
% ls -lt /Volumes/sandbox/llvm/Debug/bin/clang-cc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 fjahania admin 56965264 Dec 11 14:43 /Volumes/sandbox/
llvm/Debug/bin/clang-cc
So, what are we actually testing when using clang-cc?
- Fariborz
- Fariborz
Anders
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
