Hello, Everyone > I'm not convinced that this is the correct formulation of the > canonical type, because we may have to cope with the fact that the > default calling convention is the same as the cdecl calling convention > (always? for some targets? I don't know when). Well, at least on win there should be weird mode when default calling conv is stdcall (mostly for compatibility with vcpp-generated code, etc). mainline gcc supports this, llvm-gcc - doesn't (but there is PR for this).
-- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
