On Mar 5, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Author: dgregor
>> Date: Fri Mar  5 15:39:18 2010
>> New Revision: 97834
>> 
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=97834&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Only make __ptr64 and __w64 keywords when Microsoft extensions are enabled.
> 
> Should we add a new category for this, something like KEYALL_MS?  I
> think we want to be able to support -std=c99 -fms-extensions in a way
> that makes __ptr64 a keyword, but not _cdecl.


Because __ptr64 is in the implementation's namespace but _cdecl is not? Yeah, 
that makes sense.

        - Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to