On Mar 6, 2010, at 5:37 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Fariborz Jahanian <[email protected] > > wrote: >> >> On Mar 4, 2010, at 5:24 AM, Daniel Dunbar wrote: >> >>> Hi Fariborz, >>> >>> Is it possible to write this test to actually check the output >>> LLVM IR >>> to make sure that whatever error was fixed, is fixed? >>> >>> - Daniel >> >> I am not sure how to write a test which checks for a pattern such >> as below >> and passes >> as we go through iterations of LLVM IR generations: >> >> %tmp2 = load i8** %resval ; <i8*> [#uses=1] >> %1 = bitcast i8* %tmp2 to i8** ; <i8**> [#uses=1] >> store i8* %tmp, i8** %1 > > This doesn't seem like a pattern that would change much, as long as > the test is written to not depend on the individual names (using > FileCheck variables).
A test patch checked in http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=98073 Let's see if it survives buildbot tests. - Fariborz _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
