> CodeGenModule::CreateRuntimeFunction is the public API for that; and > actually, I think explicitly building the function pointer using it > would be better than depending on the declaration of the builtin, to > call attention to the fact that it's a libgcc call rather than an > ordinary library call.
Interesting. I was avoiding that function because it was not reusing the decl, but in this case this is OK as we know we will don't have a definition. A new patch is attached. > -Eli > Cheers, -- Rafael Ávila de Espíndola
clear_cache.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
