On Jul 5, 2010, at 11:42 AM, Charles Davis wrote: > On 7/5/10 11:19 AM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote: >> Any reason you can't follow gcc/clang's mangling scheme for >> blocks; such as '@' is already being used? > Hm? You seem to be confusing Objective-C encodings with the C++ > mangling
Yes I was. Thanks for clarification. - fariborz > scheme. Not even gcc uses '@' for blocks in C++ mangled names. It uses > 'U13block_pointer' (like clang does in Itanium mode). Besides, the '@' > character is special in the Microsoft scheme. It's used to terminate > names and argument lists. It's also used in 'structor names in place > of > the return type, because 'structors don't have declared return types. > > Chip _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
