May I have permission to check this in? On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:28 AM, John Thompson < [email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks, Eli. > > Then do I have permission to check in the front end changes, leaving the > back end as-is for now, treating any further work there as a separate issue > to be discussed first on llvmdev? > > Basically, without these front-end changes, there will be an assert in the > front end code gen (-emit-llvm) if multi-alt constraints are seen, because > the extra commas are not expected. > > -John > > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Eli Friedman <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:54 PM, John Thompson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Eli, >> > >> > So, then this is a problem with the back-end, right? Do you agree that >> the >> > back end is a better place to try to choose constraints, given that it >> knows >> > better which things are already in registers and so forth? >> >> Yes, it would fit more naturally there... but I'm not sure a proposal >> to make inline asm in the backend more complicated will be greeted >> with much enthusiasm. If you're really interested in pursuing that >> path, though, ask on llvmdev first. >> >> -Eli >> > > > > -- > John Thompson > [email protected] > > -- John Thompson [email protected]
multaltconstraints2.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
