On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:02 PM, Abramo Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: > Il 17/08/2010 01:54, Daniel Dunbar ha scritto: >> Test case? > > Sorry, but I really don't understand what you mean... the previous > signature was wrong wrt C99 and I've fixed it. > > Can you show me an example of a suitable test case?
Just a file which uses the builtins in a way which failed before, but would pass now (and which gcc accepts, presumably). - Daniel > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
