On Aug 25, 2010, at 11:04 AM, Sebastian Redl wrote:
>
> On Aug 25, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>
>> Author: dgregor
>> Date: Wed Aug 25 12:10:00 2010
>> New Revision: 112057
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=112057&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Add a code-completion context for "natural language" completions, so
>> that ASTUnit knows not to try to provide completions there.
>
> Hmm ... if there's a good way to properly access the contents of adjacent
> comments, this would be wonderful to add hooks for, say, Doxygen directives.
> As such, it might make sense to separate comments from strings.
That would be super-cool. If someone gets interested enough to add completion
hooks for Doxygen directives, it'll be easy enough to separate this into two
different kinds of completions.
> Oh, and in strings we could code-complete escape sequences (I know some Java
> IDEs that do that) or even printf/scanf directives. What fun we could have!
Okay, *that* is crazy.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
