On Sep 1, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Douglas Gregor wrote: > > On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:08 AM, Fariborz Jahanian wrote: > >> >> On Sep 1, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Ted Kremenek wrote: >> >>> Hi Fariborz, >>> >>> I thought about this (after emailing you off the list), and while I >>> agree that the naming should be better I'm not certain about using >>> "Declared." The protocols aren't actually declared, but are >>> referenced. Using "Declared" seems to conflate this concept with >>> actual declarations. >> >> Using Referenced and AllReferenced are somewhat confusing. Somehow, >> first one should refer to the declared list. >> But, if you cannot think of something better, it is ok with me. > > In other places in the AST, we've used the "AsWritten" suffix to > identify functions that return the syntactic view of the AST.
Yes, I like AsWritten as we have used it in other places. - fariborz > > > - Doug _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
