On Sep 8, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Francois Pichet wrote:
> Hi .. Are you planning to actually implement Microsoft extensions?
> If so that's great but we should make sure not to duplicate work
>
>
> Here is the tasks on my list:
>
> 2. clang must parse this: (superfluous A::)
> class A {
> int A::f() { return 0; }
> };
This would be a great ExtWarn + Fix-it, since it's a common mistake.
>
> 3. microsoft enum support:
> -clang must parse this:
> enum FOO {
> a = (FOO) 3
> };
> - forward enum must have an underlying type. (int)
> - support enum FOO : int {};
This last bit is C++0x syntax, FWIW.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
