Okay, then there is no problem. No terminator is Okay. Change the terminator needs to change the analysis engine.
2010/9/28 Marcin Świderski <[email protected]> > Forward to group... > > W dniu 28 września 2010 07:26 użytkownik Marcin Świderski < > [email protected]> napisał: > > W dniu 28 września 2010 07:18 użytkownik Zhongxing Xu < >> [email protected]> napisał: >> >> I might be wrong. Shall we add the implicit dtor before or after the >>> return stmt? I guess we should add them after the return stmt, since object >>> may be returned. But that means we would have CFGElements after the >>> terminator. >>> >>> 2010/9/28 Zhongxing Xu <[email protected]> >>> >>> Hi Marcin, >>>> >>>> There are some bugs in your patch. I tested with the code attached. The >>>> printed CFG has some errors in block B2. >>>> >>>> I'll look at the patch to try to locate the bug. >>>> >>>> >>>> This was intended. Other thing is that in VisitReturnStatement there is >> no terminator set. Maybe we could set return as terminator and instead of >> whole return add just expression it returns as element in CFG? >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
