On 15.10.2010, at 20:13, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > On 15.10.10 19.44, Sebastian Redl wrote: >> Still doesn't feel right. Doesn't this now ignore the -include >> argument completely if it can find a PCH dir but not the right >> language? > > Correct. > > I based that behavior on what the warning says, that the argument is > ignored. As I noted in the original e-mail I was wondering if the > behavior of "ignore the PCH if not first on command line and emit > warning" to fall back to passing an -include argument was intentional. > > I now realize it was, and why :) > >> It should fall back to passing an -include argument, I believe. > > Gotcha, patch coming.
Daniel, can we have a definite answer, please? Sebastian _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
