At 02:06 PM 11/1/2010, Douglas Gregor wrote: >On Nov 1, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Jim Goodnow II wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Please review and commit this patch for PR7287. Thanks. > >This isn't quite the right fix, because it won't handle, e.g., >direct calls to an operator > > operator+(x, y) > > >Instead, we should probably use FD->getIdentifier() and bail out >early if it returns NULL. > > - Doug > > > - jim > >
On the other hand, using getIdentifier() would be more general and handle other potential cases where there isn't a name. Are there such cases? - jim _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
