On 13 November 2010 17:01, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote: > The idea is that it isn't particularly useful to try to place relative paths > within a sysroot. I can't find any particular pattern in how GCC deals with > this, so it seems extremely unlikely to break anyone currently using > '-isysroot'. The only way for this to make a difference is if using > C_INCLUDE_DIRS or CXX_INCLUDE_* macros to provide relative paths.
This is probably fine. I have no idea what gcc does if one of its builtin search paths is not absolute. Can you use Path.isAbsolute()? _______________________________________________ > cfe-commits mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits > > Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
