W dniu 17 listopada 2010 04:33 użytkownik Zhongxing Xu < [email protected]> napisał:
> I guess we shouldn't handle CXXOperatorCallExpr in VisitCall(). It should > has it own code path, like CXXMemberCallExpr. > > 2010/11/17 Marcin Świderski <[email protected]> > >> Patch: For an operator call that really is a method call treat the first >> argument as a lvalue. >> >> Please approve for commit. >> >> - Marcin >> > > Yes, I forgot to mention that it's for CXXOperatorCallExpr, will add this in comment. It probably should have its own code path, but the new FstArgAsLValue argument of EvalArguments will be usable for it, so this change can be treated as the first step in proper handling of CXXOperatorCallExpr.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
