On Nov 17, 2010, at 3:51 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
>
>>
>>> + if (ReturnTy->isPODType() &&
>>> + Diags.getDiagnosticLevel(diag::warn_return_value_size) !=
>>> + Diagnostic::Ignored) {
>>
>> Is this worth doing a 'is disabled' check for it? It doesn't seem that
>> expensive. Does it cause a lot of PCH deserialization or something?
>
> This is to allow disabling the warning through #pragma diagnostic.
Oops, disregard the above comment, I don't know what I was thinking.
ASTContext::getTypeInfo will calculate a ASTRecordLayout if one is not
available.
It's debatable whether we will avoid it but better be on the safe side ?
-Argiris
>>
>> -Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
