On Jan 1, 2011, at 12:15 PM, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote: >> My opinion is that the warning is a (really low priority) QoI issue and that >> we should implement #2 and forget about people who get burned with #3. > > I'm fine with that, but it does mean that we silently miscompile #3 because > the register can be allocated normally.
Yep, understood. I still think it's the right short-term thing to do. -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
