On Jan 24, 2011, at 3:50 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch attempts to fix http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8295
>
> My reasoning is that:
>
> 1. For a regular function template declaration, one would never have
> template arguments
> 2. The same holds for overloading
> 3. For a function template explicit specialization ("full
> specialization"), one would never have template parameters.
>
> So, if a function template declaration has both template parameters
> and template arguments, it must be an attempt at partial
> specialization.
>
> I would be grateful if someone with deeper C++ knowledge could verify
> that this is correct.
Yes, this is all correct.
>
> Also, does C++0x change any of this?
No, C++0x did not change this at all.
Your patch looks great. I've committed it as r124135, thanks!
- Doug_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
