> If we want to warn on extraneous qualifiers for conversions functions, I
> feel like that should be a separate warning tailored to the situation.
> Calling it a 'return type' is a bit confusing.
True. Also, is the const in
class foo {
operator int * const ();
};
really redundant? Are there cases where that operator would be selected
but one without a const would not?
Cheers,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
