On Mar 21, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hi Bill > >> Are these changes good enough (approved) for the 2.9 release? > I think yes. Also, I think the patch for PR8778 should also go in; I > don't like it and think it can be generalized, but for now it's the > best solution available. > Okay. I merged in all of the changes except for PR9483. Please let me know when that's finished and ready to merge in.
-bw _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
