I think the wording in the patch is fine, and accomplishes this goal. On Apr 6, 2011, at 11:50 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks good to me. Please also change "is possibly uninitialized" to "may be > uninitialized" while you're at it, thanks! > > On some further discussion, I think I understand what these messages were > aiming at: the 'possibly' isn't about whether we've proven there to be a path > leading to uninitialized use, but the fact that we haven't proven *all* paths > to cause an uninitialized use.... > > I still want some different wording here. Do you think the wording I proposed > in the patch is actually OK for this? Is there a better way to phrase it?
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
