On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 04:27:25PM -0700, Ted Kremenek wrote:
> Should we perhaps forgo trying to put all this naive checks in
> CheckSecuritySyntaxOnly, and instead focus on trying to do the real
> validation?  It seems to me for folks who want to outright ban the use
> of a certain function (which is at the level of what
> CheckSecuritySyntax only is doing) then perhaps we should add compiler
> support for banning family of functions from the command line.

GCC has the poison pragma for that purpose, it could be used easily e.g.
with -include.

Joerg
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to