On Mar 31, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Clang 2.9 contains complete and tested support for C++0x's
> trailing-return-type feature, but the website claims otherwise. This plus
> a couple of related things are fixed in this patch. I've not marked
> trailing-return-type codegen as tested since I've not spotted any tests
> that we do name mangling right.
>
> OK to commit?
FWIW, I believe that we are still missing proper name-mangling support for
function parameters that occur within a trailing return type. That's why I
hadn't updated the C++0x status page yet.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
