On Apr 20, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Jim Goodnow II wrote:
> Hi Ted,
>
> Yes, we do. The real purpose of the nullptr is the last part of the test
> program where it allows you to distinguish between two overloaded
> functions, i.e.:
>
> void func( int );
> void func( int *);
>
> If you call it with the standard NULL, it will call the "int" version,
> whereas if you call it with nullptr, it will call the "int *" version.
That shouldn't matter to the static analyzer, since Sema has already performed
overload resolution long before the static analyzer ever sees the AST.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
