Committed at r131043.

On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On May 6, 2011, at 2:48 PM, Richard Trieu wrote:
>
> Changed the error message back to the original form.
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Richard Trieu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Patch for PR7409.  Remove multiple error on invalid typedefs.  Once the
>> first error is emitted, suppress additional errors when using the invalid
>> typedefs.  Also, change the handling of types inside instantiations to be
>> more descriptive.
>>
>> Patch attached and available in Code Review:
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/4430069/
>>
>
>
> -
> -      SemaRef.Diag(TL.getBeginLoc(), diag::err_nested_name_spec_non_tag)
> -        << TL.getType() << SS.getRange();
> +      // If the namespace is an invalid type def, don't emit an error
> because
>
> s/namespace/nested-name-specifier?
>
> +      // a previous error should have already been emitted.
>
> will have already been emitted, we hope :)
>
> +      TypedefTypeLoc* TTL = dyn_cast<TypedefTypeLoc>(&TL);
> +      if (!TTL || !TTL->getTypedefNameDecl()->isInvalidDecl()) {
> +        SemaRef.Diag(TL.getBeginLoc(),
> diag::err_nested_name_spec_non_tag)
> +          << TL.getType() << SS.getRange();
> +      }
>        return NestedNameSpecifierLoc();
>
> Looks good, thanks!
>
> - Doug
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to