On May 31, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On May 31, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > >> How about __builtin_instruction_prefetch? Or is too long? >> >> Evan >> >> On May 31, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Bruno Cardoso Lopes wrote: >> >>>> Adding another argument to @llvm.prefetch is fine. But what do you propose >>>> for C level builtin? >>> >>> __builtin_iprefetch or __builtin_icache_prefetch, with an address >>> argument only, either are fine for me. What's your opinion? >>> > > FWIW I like __builtin_iprefetch. It's a shame the original prefetch wasn't > __builtin_dprefetch. > > If we wanted some symmetry we could have both __builtin_icache_prefetch and > __builtin_dcache_prefetch, the second being an alias to the existing > __builtin_prefetch.
I don't have a strong preference. All of these names seem fine. Evan > > -eric > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
