On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:15 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Jun 13, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>>> Nice, thanks for landing this Doug.
>>>
>>> Some random comments:
>>>
>>> 1. Should this have a __has_feature check?
>>>
>>> 2. Should the dox in the manual mention
>>> -f[no-]objc-infer-related-result-type?
>>
>> IMO, "no" to both… this is meant to be an evolutionary step for the
>> language, and the flags are really just there in case we run into trouble
>> and need to back off on these changes. We've not yet seen any need for these
>> flags, and they may go away in the future if we continue to see no need for
>> them.
>
> Ok, I thought you were going to publicize the option, if it goes away in the
> future, then I agree with you here. I also can't think of a reason to use
> the check. Is there any reason not to remove the flag now? :)
Nope! r132919.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
