On Jun 14, 2011, at 4:04 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: >>>> when compiling in a GNU mode (e.g. gnu99) treat VLAs with a size that can >>>> be folded to a constant >>>> as constant size arrays. This has slightly different semantics in some >>>> insane cases, but allows >>>> us to accept some constructs that GCC does. Continue to be pedantic in >>>> -std=c99 and other >>>> modes. This addressed rdar://8733881 - error "variable-sized object may >>>> not be initialized"; g++ accepts same code >>> >>> http://smooshlab.apple.com:8013/builders/gccTestSuite_clang-x86_64-darwin10-RA__c >> >> Interesting, one instance (array-5.c) is failing exactly because of what >> we're trying to do here. Passing -std=c99 fixes the failure. Does anyone >> know how to do this to the test? > > /* { dg-options { -std=c99 } } */
Thanks! I fixed the two failures I introduced, but there are still some failures remaining. These happened before my commit, an example run is here: http://smooshlab.apple.com:8013/builders/gccTestSuite_clang-x86_64-darwin10-RA__c/builds/805/steps/test-gcc-4_2-testsuite-gcc/logs/tests.FAIL Buildbot pins the blame on a small range of commits: r132973 (pcc)'s patch is the most likely candidate. -Chris _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
