On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not a big fan of this change. In general, we've taken the approach that > the "silence the warning" option is always first. Ahh. Is that documented anywhere? It's not enforced by tests that I can see... Anyways, didn't realize there was any policy. I actually find this fairly unfortunate across the board. Most of the cases where we have an alternative to silencing the warning, it's a more likely alternative. It'd seem nice to invert the policy (silence comes last), but maybe that can't be changed at this late stage.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
