On 07/14/2011 03:08 PM, Sebastian Redl wrote: > Author: cornedbee > Date: Thu Jul 14 14:08:10 2011 > New Revision: 135177 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=135177&view=rev > Log: > For C++11, do more checking of initializer lists up-front, enabling some > subset of the final functionality. C just leaves the function early. C++98 > runs through the same code path, but has no changed functionality either. > This is a first baby step towards supporting generalized initializer lists. > This also removes an aggregate > test case that was just plain wrong, assuming that non-aggregates couldn't be > initialized with initializer lists > in C++11 mode.
This caused PR10363, so I reverted it. Cheers, Rafael _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
