On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Francois Pichet wrote: > Author: fpichet > Date: Tue Jul 26 20:05:24 2011 > New Revision: 136203 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=136203&view=rev > Log: > In Microsoft mode, if we are within a templated function and we can't resolve > Identifier during BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier, then extend the SS with > Identifier. This will have the effect of resolving Identifier during > template instantiation. The goal is to be able to resolve a function call > whose nested-name-specifier is located inside a dependent base class.
Shouldn't this be gated on DelayedTemplateParsing rather than Microsoft mode? John. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
