I hate to pull out the bikeshed paint... But why not! On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Kaelyn Uhrain <[email protected]> wrote:
> I moved TDK_InvalidExplicitArguments to rank 5 and made TDK_Too*Arguments > rank 6 since I feel it's slightly more likely that someone gave the wrong > argument to a template than to have the wrong number of arguments (with > candidates needing the wrong number of arguments being a more common case, > especially candidates that are way way out in left field). I'm not sure actually. I often leave one argument off the end of a function. I don't think that's too unlikely. Ah, I think I know what I really want here. If the arguments that are specified match the parameters, but there simply aren't enough or is one too many, I would rank that candidate before an explicit argument mismatch. If the arguments don't match the parameter types *and* there are too many or not enough, I would rank that candidate after. Is that feasible to implement?
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
