On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:

> On Sep 9, 2011, at 11:05 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:40 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:12 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 9, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Douglas Gregor wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 8, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Author: akirtzidis
>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Fri Sep  9 01:44:17 2011
>>>>>>>>>>> New Revision: 139358
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=139358&view=rev
>>>>>>>>>>> Log:
>>>>>>>>>>> [PCH] When loading the decls linked to an identifier, also make 
>>>>>>>>>>> them visible
>>>>>>>>>>> in the translation unit.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>>>>>>> cfe/trunk/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>> URL: 
>>>>>>>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp?rev=139358&r1=139357&r2=139358&view=diff
>>>>>>>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>>>>>>>> --- cfe/trunk/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp (original)
>>>>>>>>>>> +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp Fri Sep  9 01:44:17 
>>>>>>>>>>> 2011
>>>>>>>>>>> @@ -4841,8 +4841,16 @@
>>>>>>>>>>> return;
>>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> +  ASTContext &Ctx = *getContext();
>>>>>>>>>>> for (unsigned I = 0, N = DeclIDs.size(); I != N; ++I) {
>>>>>>>>>>> NamedDecl *D = cast<NamedDecl>(GetDecl(DeclIDs[I]));
>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>> +    // In C++, translation unit's visible decls map gets emitted 
>>>>>>>>>>> in the AST
>>>>>>>>>>> +    // file, but not on C; make the decl visible so it can be 
>>>>>>>>>>> looked up.
>>>>>>>>>>> +    if (!Ctx.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus)
>>>>>>>>>>> +      SetExternalVisibleDeclsForName(Ctx.getTranslationUnitDecl(),
>>>>>>>>>>> +                                     DeclarationName(II), D);
>>>>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> This is a bit unfortunate. Creating the lookup table in the 
>>>>>>>>>> translation unit forces the AST to continually maintain that lookup 
>>>>>>>>>> table (e.g., adding entries to it every time a visible declaration 
>>>>>>>>>> is added to the translation unit), which is a cost we'd like to 
>>>>>>>>>> avoid in C. I presume that you only made this change to support the 
>>>>>>>>>> new lookup used in  r139359? I have an alternative suggestion for 
>>>>>>>>>> that...
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> But adding entries always updated the lookup table, or the lookup in 
>>>>>>>>> r139359 would not work in non-PCH mode, right ? 
>>>>>>>>> In general I'd find it bad for the AST usefulness if you could not do 
>>>>>>>>> a lookup in translation unit unless it is on C++.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It's more subtle than that. The lookup table for a DeclContext is 
>>>>>>>> constructed lazily, when one performs the first lookup, by walking the 
>>>>>>>> declarations lexically in that context and populating the table. Once 
>>>>>>>> a table is there, it is maintained as declarations are added to the 
>>>>>>>> DeclContext.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I see the error of my ways now. Note however that, outside of this fix, 
>>>>>>> it's very unfortunate that lookup does not work on a loaded C AST.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I think it should work, but it's super-inefficient because it will 
>>>>>> deserialize the whole translation unit.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Once a declaration is loaded through the identifier it can be found in 
>>>>> lexical decls linked list right ? It's only of matter then to figure out 
>>>>> that if no result is returned from looking up at the external ast source, 
>>>>> it doesn't mean that no decl with that name exists, but that the source 
>>>>> didn't store a map; in which case we recreate the map with only the 
>>>>> lexical decls that were already loaded (and subsequent 
>>>>> loaded-through-identifier decls will get added to the existing map)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Ahhh, you are correct. Which means this is already broken :(
>>>> 
>>>> Perhaps we should just take the performance hit when building an AST file 
>>>> for a C translation unit, generating the lookup table for the translation 
>>>> unit as AST writing time so we can serialize it.
>>> 
>>> Rough estimate: ObjC PCH for Cocoa.h is -20% compared to the ObjC++ PCH, is 
>>> this acceptable hit ?
>> 
>> 
>> ObjC++ includes a bunch of extra stuff, so that will over-estimate the cost… 
>> I went ahead and measured the actual cost of doing this. It's an 8% increase 
>> in PCH size, which I think is unacceptable. 
>> 
>> Looking back at DeclContext::buildLookup, I don't actually see why it would 
>> be broken. It walks the lexical context using decls_begin()/decls_end(), 
>> which should load all of the lexical declarations on-demand from the PCH 
>> file. Something is fishy here.
> 
> buildLookup is not getting called if there is an external ast source present, 
> looking up is delegated to the source; see DeclContext::lookup and the "if 
> (hasExternalVisibleStorage()) {" check.

… but there is no external visible storage for the TU in C. If there were, we 
wouldn't be worrying about this.

        - Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to