On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Caitlin Sadowski <[email protected]>wrote:

> Attached is a patch which skips analysis inside of lock functions
> (avoiding spurious warnings).
>

Can you give examples of the real-world code that would trigger warnings
without this? I have to admit I'm a bit suspect. It seems like if you're
doing something other than atomic operations and system calls inside of your
lock function, you might well want thread safety annotations for that....
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to