On 20.09.2011 06:55, Chandler Carruth wrote: > Author: chandlerc > Date: Mon Sep 19 23:55:26 2011 > New Revision: 140138 > > > Testing this is a bit awkward. I've done it by running the > noreturn-sensitive tests in both modes, which previous failed and now > passes, but if anyone has ideas about how to more specifically and > thoroughly test that the extended info on a destructor is preserved when > adding noexcept, I'm all ears. > Can we attach a deprecated attribute to the destructor instead? That would more directly generate warnings to test on.
Sebastian _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
