> > I don't think that's the correct solution for many of these cases >> > One other point on this - the issues you've raised already exist in both assert and llvm_unreachable code, making this change (assert(0) -> llvm_unreachable) somewhat orthogonal to them.
Though I'm happy to address them too, once we figure out which way to go, either before or after this change. (& I'd also like to make similar changes to llvm too, if we want to include them in the discussion and eventually enshrine these decisions in the dev documentation) - David
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
