On Oct 11, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Rafael Ávila de Espíndola wrote: > Would a patch dropping the list from callsFunctionThatReturnsTwice be OK for > 3.0 or 3.1?
Removing the list doesn't add value, but does add risk, so it should wait for 3.1. Make sure you coordinate with Duncan to have Dragonegg annotate these functions. /jakob
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
