I don't really understand your comments. The doxygen comments only have value for generating documentation when they are paired with the actual things they are documenting. Having a bunch of comments that look like they are documenting non-existent members looks like turds in the code to me.
Sent from my iPad On Oct 13, 2011, at 9:39 PM, John McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 13, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Ted Kremenek wrote: >> Author: kremenek >> Date: Thu Oct 13 23:15:15 2011 >> New Revision: 141942 >> >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=141942&view=rev >> Log: >> Move doxygen comments to pair with the actual values. > > Okay, but now these comments aren't in the logical place that I would look > for them to figure out the class layout for a FunctionProtoType, and the > layout information seems completely out of context when applied to the > members in ExtProtoInfo. > > John. _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
