On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:39 AM, jahanian wrote: > > On Oct 14, 2011, at 10:35 AM, Argyrios Kyrtzidis wrote: > >> On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:56 AM, jahanian wrote: >> >>> Don't we already have logic for finding previous declarations; say for >>> ivars, or c++ men functions? >> >> No, because ivars and C++ member functions cannot be redeclared (wish it >> wasn't allowed for objc methods either..) > > Interesting, from actual code I assume.
Well actually, just FYI, the definition of a C++ member function is considered in the AST as a redeclaration that is marked using the Redeclarable template. > >> >> For declarations that can get redeclared, like FunctionDecl, we use the >> Redeclarable template but I didn't want to increase the size of ObjC methods >> for such an uncommon case. > > OK thanks. > > - Fariborz > > _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
