On 14 October 2011 19:09, Nick Lewycky <[email protected]> wrote: > [+cfe-commits because there's now a clang patch involved too.] >
Sorry. +cfe-commits the mailing list this time. :-/ On 14 October 2011 13:56, Eric Christopher <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 14, 2011, at 1:12 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote: >> >> Does anybody really, really care about the .s format emitted by clang/llc >> staying compatible with older assemblers? If so, do you have a suggestion >> for how we should go about maintaining compatibility? >> >> >> Given all of the whining we get about not supporting someone's ancient >> this or that… a bit. >> >> The standard way to do this would be an autoconf check to see if it >> successfully assembles the file directive. >> > > I've gone ahead and implemented control for this just like the CFI > directives. It turns off with -no-integrated-as or -fno-dwarf-directory-asm > on clang, or with -disable-dwarf-directory on llc. The > -fno-dwarf-directory-asm flag is ignored when emitting .o files directly. > > Please review! > > Nick > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
