On Oct 20, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Chandler Carruth wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Richard Trieu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Should Clang be printing suffixes that are accepted only with certain flags?
>
> I think this is an interesting policy decision. I'd love to hear Doug's
> thoughts on it.
>
> It seems fine to me for Clang, when running with -fms-extensions, to suggest
> fixes even if only valid for -fms-extensions. Clearly if there is a generic
> suggestion that could be made, that would be a preferred alternative. For
> example, '__asm__' should be suggested before 'asm'.
I think it's fine for Clang to print suffixes that are only accepted with
certain flags. Presumably, you should never get an IntegerLiteral of type
__int128_t unless you're in a dialect that supports parsing it.
… except that we cheat when we're building template arguments, because it was
convenient. That cheating could be eliminated by encoding integer literal
values directly within SubstNonTypeTemplateParmExpr.
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
