On Oct 24, 2011, at 10:59 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
> Here's a fairly non-intrusive fix for PR11216: "Can't derive from a
> decltype-specifier" including a couple of test cases & some updated
> naming/comments.
>
> Let me know if this looks OK & I'll check it in.
It looks pretty good, but I have two requests:
1) The "else" that handles class-names is really long. I think the flow would
be better if decltype() was handled completely in its own "if" early on, since
it shares so little code with the class-name case.
2) Please add some tests that have a dependent decltype expression, to make
sure template instantiation works. I'm sure it will, but...
- Doug
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
