Il giorno 25/ott/2011, alle ore 13:31, Abramo Bagnara ha scritto: > > No, it is not useless because it is the reason why the decay has happened. > > The agreed intention is to move toward a direction where we mark as NoOp > only casts that has no effects (i.e. that can be removed without > influencing neither parsing nor execution). > > A cast whose presence is the reason why the array decay to pointer is > done is not a redundant cast. > > Of course the context should not be taken in consideration i.e. the > expression should be considered in isolation. > > int a[4]; > int *p; > p = (int*)a; > sizeof((int*)a); > > Both array to pointer cast are relevant despite the fact that only in > one case the context would have generated it nevertheless. > > Do you think is a sensible approach?
I'm not sure, but I agree that this way the AST would be more consistent. I'll try to see how to change this detail. In the meantime, Doug what do you think? Bye, Nicola _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
