On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 6:01 PM, David Blaikie <[email protected]> wrote:
> Test case?

Now attached, though it did point out one area I need some help
solving (I added a TODO in the patch).  We're not allowed to cast away
constness with this, but I can't figure out a reasonable way to do it
since we may not be dealing with pointer types.

~Aaron

>
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Aaron Ballman <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This is a patch for fixing 11747, allowing reinterpret_cast to "cast"
>> where the source and destination types are the same as per
>> [expr.reinterpret.cast]p2.  The fix itself is fairly simple -- the
>> code was already there, it just needed to be moved up slightly since
>> the previous check was for source and dest being pointers.
>>
>> ~Aaron
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>

Attachment: reinterpret_cast.patch
Description: Binary data

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to