On Jan 20, 2012, at 12:21 PM, Matthieu Monrocq wrote: > Never mind, the issue has already been opened: > > http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#2013 > > Howard > > > Thanks Howard for the reference. > > I would have gone for a slightly different proposal (giving an exhaustive > list of the C functions that should be so tagged) as the current proposal > seems to create some non-portable situations (unless you wrap all such > functions in functions of your own and resort to the SFINAE trick exposed by > Richard). > > I am also a bit sad that the last activity on this issue is recorded as being > nearly a year ago. Is there a way to bump issues ?
You could try emailing the author of the list and see if they would allow you to place a comment in the issue, perhaps including an alternate resolution. I don't know if the current LWG chair will be comfortable with that procedure or not. One of the surest ways to get an issue to a higher priority is to regularly attend meetings, and be patient but alert to opportunities to bring a particular issue up for discussion. I.e. sometimes the chair will ask: Does anyone have a particular issue they would like looked at before we plow through them in some pre-arranged order? Here's the current meeting schedule: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/meetings Howard _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
