On 20.01.2012, at 21:39, Ted Kremenek wrote: > Author: kremenek > Date: Fri Jan 20 14:39:55 2012 > New Revision: 148567 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=148567&view=rev > Log: > Per PR 11814, use Monospace instead of Andale Mono. > > Modified: > cfe/trunk/lib/Rewrite/HTMLRewrite.cpp > > Modified: cfe/trunk/lib/Rewrite/HTMLRewrite.cpp > URL: > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/trunk/lib/Rewrite/HTMLRewrite.cpp?rev=148567&r1=148566&r2=148567&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- cfe/trunk/lib/Rewrite/HTMLRewrite.cpp (original) > +++ cfe/trunk/lib/Rewrite/HTMLRewrite.cpp Fri Jan 20 14:39:55 2012 > @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ > " body { font-family:Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size:10pt }\n" > " h1 { font-size:14pt }\n" > " .code { border-collapse:collapse; width:100%; }\n" > - " .code { font-family: \"Andale Mono\", monospace; font-size:10pt }\n" > + " .code { font-family: \"Monospace\", monospace; font-size:10pt }\n" > " .code { line-height: 1.2em }\n" > " .comment { color: green; font-style: oblique }\n" > " .keyword { color: blue }\n"
Is there actually a difference between "Monospace" and monospace? Does the first refer to a particular font family or is it also interpreted as the generic font class? I also don't understand the original complaint. Do Linux systems have some horrible Andale Mono font installed? Because if not, then the problem is that user's horrible fallback monospace font. Sebastian _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
