On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:29:54PM -0000, Ted Kremenek wrote: > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=148859&view=rev > > Log: > > Teach scanf/printf checking about '%Ld' and friends (a GNU extension). > Fixes PR 9466. > > Can we please stop adding GNU extensions for scanf/printf until they have > a proper options to request them? I don't understand, what options do you want? If you would like some ability to enforce strictness, I think ext-warn and other such diagnostics for use of extensions might be an option. Propose an actual feature with patches? > At the moment, I consider this more > harmful than complaining about them unconditionally. > Clang does aim for compatibility, and this is nothing new. I think it is very reasonable for folks to get Clang to not warn on correctly behaving code.
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
