> I like this name better, if at least it was also pointing to the top > dir of the gcc install, as this name implies... Is there a reason we > need to point to the subdir that contains the libstdc++ include files > instead of pointing to the top dir of the toolchain?
We don't need to point to the inner directory, and this patch changes that. We used to just because it was easier in the days we had no central logic for understanding a gcc installation layout. > So we want clang to use a gcc based toolchain, then why don't we call > it --with-gcc-toolchain? I like the idea of having "prefix" in the name to match the "--prefix" option used when building gcc. An updated patch is attached. Is there anything else I have do change for cmake? I do intend to make this a runtime option too, but can that be a follow up patch? > Sebastian > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc is a member of Code Aurora Forum Cheers, Rafael
llvm.patch
Description: Binary data
clang.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
