Le 24 févr. 2012 à 20:47, Jonathan Sauer a écrit : > Hello, > > following the discussion in cfe-dev[*], I decided to put my money where my > mouth is and have attached a patch > that makes it possible to use __has_feature(__feature__) in place of > __has_feature(feature) to protect the > feature name in case the user defines a macro with the same name. > > I modeled the patch after the similar handling of __attribute__ names. >
Shouldn't __has_extension be updated to. It must be consistent with __has_feature. -- Jean-Daniel _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
